Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 15:27

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How an unnoticed pregnancy complication almost ended a young Staten Island mom’s life - SILive.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Are there any industries or sectors where ChatGPT is particularly well-suited for implementation?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why did the American's mulberry harbor not hold up after D-Day?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NASA to silence Voyager's social media accounts - theregister.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Alex Cora Takes Blame for Red Sox Woes After Extra Innings Loss - Sports Illustrated
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.